Join Nostr
2026-01-02 00:10:03 UTC
in reply to

U-P-G-R-A-Y-E-D-D on Nostr: I read the paper. It only further reinforced my skepticism. I don't want to take the ...

I read the paper. It only further reinforced my skepticism.

I don't want to take the time to write a detailed critique, but I think the first peer reviewer's opinions are on point:

https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41586-025-09526-6/MediaObjects/41586_2025_9526_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

The QC "calculations" are totally made up to justify the QC actually doing something beyond random noise. There is zero connection to any practical computation.

I can't believe how many people fall for this shit. It reads like a parody of Eric Weinstein's Theory of Everything. However, the commitment to the bit is impressive.